When scholars conduct research on cross-cultural or intercultural communication, they often tend to put an emphasis on cross-nation or cross-racial communication. In an international environment, which may be an oil platform, a fashion show, or a sporting event, every culture struggles for domination, makes it clear the Chair of the Organizing Committee of the Conference on Social Studies in Dallas, Harlan Porter. It would be extremely difficult for a guy from Bulgaria, who does not know the language, to get by without the translation skills of a French Translator professional if he/she visits France. Furthermore, there may be tension between a husband and a wife, for example, if one of them is a native and the other one an immigrant, as the social status may lead to negative consequences. Even though the actors in a play that involves interacting in more than one language may be independent, their aspiration toward successful communication will make them interdependent as they will become part of the whole group. If we imagine some business negotiations in which one of the partners is more motivated than the other, the outcome for the former will be positive, while for the latter – negative.
If we have a closer look into the transfer from the state of independence to the state of interdependence, we will see that it is a complicated process with multi-faceted features. It will be a good idea to concentrate on the part of the social discourse that Assoc. Prof. Luke Fleming and the young scholars under his guidance have wisely entitled “holes.” What they have been concentrating on is a demarcation of some elements required to describe the process of communication. If we take an occasion in which a Spanish salesman, who goes to Germany on an exchange program, but has poor knowledge of the culture, will have to spend some of his grant on a German Translation business, which is financially unfavorable under the circumstances. Evolution is one of the key factors that distances human beings from the other creatures, and communication has been one of the driving forces without which this evolution would not have been possible.
The most important variables in the communication process must be established and shape up into a concept that will give the basis for explaining the nature of intercultural discourse. That scheme will then be used to identify the principles that apply to communication events within a given class or subclass of events. For instance, an American traveler, who has come to Portugal, may require interpretation help by a Portuguese Translation agent, if he/she is to survive in a completely unknown country. Just as scientists like anthropologists and paleontologists organize their species, the same process may be employed here. It should be an expanding system that derives from rational theoretic principles capable of explaining new events and readily adjustable to the increasing theoretic knowledge of the communication process. Having in mind that communication processes can be heterogeneous and homogeneous, the classification of communication occurrences may help identify the various types. The investigation carried out has shown that multicultural actors base their actions on one of the previously mentioned aspect of the communication process. The difference here lies in the fact that contrasting behavior is exhibited in inter and intracultural events, which means that the focal point of research must be moved to the critical variables.